Rediff Logo
Money
Line
Home > Money > Reuters > Report
August 13, 2002 | 1816 IST
Feedback  
  Money Matters

 -  Business Headlines
 -  Corporate Headlines
 -  Business Special
 -  Columns
 -  IPO Center
 -  Message Boards
 -  Mutual Funds
 -  Personal Finance
 -  Stocks
 -  Tutorials
 -  Search rediff

    
      








 Secrets every
 mother should
 know



 Your Lipstick
 talks!



 Need some
 Extra Finance?



 Bathroom singing
 goes techno!



 
Reuters
 Search the Internet
         Tips
 Sites: Finance, Investment

Print this page Best Printed on  HP Laserjets
E-Mail this report to a friend

US court rules against Dr Reddy's in patent case

A US court has ruled against Dr Reddy's Laboratories and other generic drugmakers in a patent infringement case over the antibiotic Cipro, according to the court's Web site.

The site, www.fedcir.gov, said the US district court in New Jersey had upheld on Friday the patent of Bayer AG, which discovered the drug.

Several drugmakers, led by Schein Pharmaceutical Inc, Mylan Laboratories and Dr Reddy's US subsidiary, Reddy Cheminor Inc, had challenged the validity of a Bayer patent on Cipro expiring in December 2003.

A spokesman for Dr Reddy's declined comment on the ruling.

Dr Reddy's, India's only US-listed drugmaker, said in July it had received approvals from the United States Food and Drug Administration to launch a generic version of 100, 250, 500 and 750 mg versions of Cipro.

But analysts said the court judgement meant Reddy's would no longer be able to launch the drug.

Like other Indian drugmakers, Dr Reddy's is focusing on the US market for generics, or drugs no longer covered by patents. Analysts say margins in the US generics market are thrice as large as margins in India, which has some of the lowest drug prices in the world.

Dr Reddy's shares ended down 0.41 per cent at Rs 868.45 on the Bombay Stock Exchange, whose benchmark rose 0.95 per cent.

ALSO READ:
More Money Headlines

Back to top
(c) Copyright 2002 Reuters Limited. All rights reserved. Republication or redistribution of Reuters content, including by framing or similar means, is expressly prohibited without the prior written consent of Reuters. Reuters shall not be liable for any errors or delays in the content, or for any actions taken in reliance thereon.

Tell us what you think of this report

ADVERTISEMENT