 | « Back to article | Print this article |
Talk of domination in the air
Once a word used to deride England's cricketers, "predictable" is fast becoming a badge of honour that captain Andrew Strauss and his squad can wear with pride.
Two crushing Test victories over India, the second coming in a rush of wickets at Trent Bridge on Monday, have put England on the brink of the top ranking in the five-day format of the game and talk of "domination" is in the air.
- Images: Clinical England thrash India by 319 runs
While there have been many false dawns, the momentous 2005 Ashes win over Australia being one of them, the riches available to Strauss and manager Andy Flower suggest the D word is not out of place.
England's back-up options are the envy of the world
In fast bowlers James Anderson, Stuart Broad and Chris Tremlett and off-spinner Graeme Swann, England have an attack full of potency while Tim Bresnan showed in taking five wickets to skittle India for 158 that Strauss has the kind of back-up options that are the envy of the world.
What India would have done for a bowler of Bresnan's quality as they toiled in the heat with the game slipping away from them on Sunday afternoon?
Wicketkeeper Matt Prior has improved beyond measure with the gloves and his batting is now approaching the heights reached by great Australian Adam Gilchrist in the all-conquering sides captained by Steve Waugh and Ricky Ponting.
Comparisons with Australian team of yore
Although openers Strauss and Alastair Cook are struggling for runs, the batting order rarely collapses like a house of cards these days and the tailenders regularly score heavily.
Bresnan and Broad contributed 209 runs to England's cause at Trent Bridge, a key factor in the 319-run victory which left the hosts 2-0 up and top-ranked India staring at a demoralising rout.
Kevin Pietersen has put his ego to one side and emerged as a batsman who can dig in for the common cause while Ian Bell, with a Test average of 47, is world class.
Comparisons with the swaggering Australian teams for whom victory was almost a pre-requisite are not misplaced, especially when considering the fringe players who have proved consistently that they can come in and feed off the confidence within the ranks.
England look like a team to be measured against
England have won seven of their last eight Test series. That should soon become eight from nine and although matching the domination of Australia, who between 2000 and 2008 lost just two series, is unlikely, they certainly look like the team to be measured against for the forseeable future.
It is all a far cry from the days of tortoise-like scoring rates followed by rapid collapses, scatter-gun bowling and sloppy fielding which drew scorn from Down Under.
'England are showing qualities that will make them No. 1'
Shane Warne, once the tormentor of England's batsman, sees many similarities with the Australian sides he played in.
"When Australia were on top and dominating world cricket, the things we wanted to do were score fast, take the game away from the opposition and intimidate the tail," Warne wrote in the Daily Telegraph on Tuesday.
"England are doing all those things and showing the qualities that will make them No. 1."
'Best England team I have ever seen'
Warne said there were no obvious weaknesses in England's squad and like Australia of old, someone would make runs or take wickets at the important moments.
"England are not carrying anyone," he said. "When you become No.1 side in the world it is all about depth."
Former England captain Nasser Hussain heaped praise on Strauss's team.
"There is just no weak link," he said. "They are the best England team I have ever seen. They are an amazing set of players....I think England are now realising that they are embarking on what might become a very special journey."
© Copyright 2024 Reuters Limited. All rights reserved. Republication or redistribution of Reuters content, including by framing or similar means, is expressly prohibited without the prior written consent of Reuters. Reuters shall not be liable for any errors or delays in the content, or for any actions taken in reliance thereon.