Dravid, three weeks short of his 39th birthday, said with age a player's batting style changes but an aging cricketer could still make valuable contribution to the team.
"It (age) does change things, there's no doubt about it. You're a different player than you were as a 24-year-old or a 30-year-old. I think actually it is about recognising that, yes, you do change, as a person, as a player"
"Will you be the same player as you were at 28? Maybe not. Can you still be effective and play a role for your side? Probably, yes. A lot of people get hung up on looking at a player in what they think is his prime, and they think he should play like that all the time; it will never happen. You might play the odd innings like that again but even Viv Richards was not the same player when he finished," he said.
Dravid said a player should continue playing the game and even favoured coming out of retirement, just the way legendary Australian swimmer Ian Thorpe did.
"I was reading what Ian Thorpe said when he came out of retirement and somebody asked him about his legacy: 'What are you doing to your legacy by coming back and coming eighth in a race?' And he said, 'I can sacrifice my legacy for the love of the sport," Dravid said.
"That makes sense. It's pure, he [Thorpe] still enjoys swimming and he enjoys competing. He's not concerned about his legacy, he's concerned about what actually made him play the game in the first place, which is that love of the game, the desire to compete and play. And that will go at some stage. That probably should be the decision," he said.
this
Users
Comment
article