Letter of the Day
November 1, 2002
Expert Commentators -- or are they?
At times while watching the games on TV, I get
the urge to mute the commentary by our so called
expert commentators.
The funny part of it all is that they try very hard
to sound intelligent while what they don't understand
is that any average listener figures out about their
attempt to sound intelligent. It is one thing to be
a tiger and it is quite another, to attempt to behave
like one. That's the part they do not understand. As
a result they make themselves look like bunch of
idiots.
It seems to have been taken for granted that anyone
who has played international cricket is by default qualifies to be an expert commentator. I fail to understand why a commentator has to be an ex-player? With the exceptation of Harsha Bhogle, every other commentator I've listened to is an ex-player. Giving running commentary is an art and not everyone has that art. None of our current ex-player turned commentator
seems to have that art.
Take Ravi Shastri for example -he has about 20 to 25 sentences that he uses in every single game. I've never found him using a single new sentence outside of that list of 20 to 25 pre-defined sentences. Well, if commentary is all about remembering those 20 to 25 sentences and delivering them, you don't need a Ravi Shastri to do that who probably takes a big chunk of money to deliver them day in and day out. Commentators need to be intelligent and work on improving their art which none of these commentators do. At times they even
contradict each other.
Following is an example -
3rd Test: Day 1: Morning Session: Commentators Michael
Holding and Ravi Shastri.
Ravi: I think West Indies may have made a big blunder
by including 4 fast bowlers in the line up.
3rd Test: Day 1: Post tea session: Commentators
Michael Holding and Maninder Singh.
Maninder: West Indies has done the right thing by
going in with 4 fast bowlers. That is their strength
and the team should play to its strength.
What a joke ?? And we call them expert commentators.
Another example of how our expert commentators try
hard to sound intelligent -
3rd Test: Day 1: Commentator Arun Lal
He was commenting on Sanjay Bangar's game till that
point.
Arun: Sanjay should learn to rotate strike. If he does
not rotate the strike nor does he score runs, pressure
will be built up for the other player. And then,
because of pressure, he will do something silly and
get out.
Now, any damn listener knows this and one does not
need an expert commentator to share it with listeners.
It baffles me why these companies pay big money and
hire these idiots as commentators. They should hire
people who may not have played the game but know the
game well enough to talk intelligently and such people
who know the art of commentating. When that happens
the game will become more lively to watch on TV.
Binay Das
Previous letters: