Risk-adjusted return? To generate a return, there has to be some risk taken. Is the return generated due to smart investment decisions or excessive risks? This can be judged by looking at the Sharpe ratio of the funds.
X fund may give 15 per cent return and Y fund 12 per cent, but Y may be better by taking less risk taken to produce the return. The higher the Sharpe ratio, the better the risk-adjusted returns. This can help decide between funds in a peer group.
Product tenure?
Does the tenure of the product match your financial goals? If not, you may not have the money when you need it.
Longer tenures in debt and equity products have different connotations. In debt, if you do not intend to hold the product till maturity, a longer tenure means more risk.
This is specifically because debt products are interest-rate dependent. With an upswing in the interest rate, your low interest rate paper will fetch a lower price in the market if you decide to sell it. If the interest rates fall, your high-returns paper will fetch you good.
This risk will be negated if you intend to hold the product till maturity. You will get what has been promised to you (of course, depending on the company's credit-worthiness).
In the case of equity, it is seen that over longer tenures, the risk becomes negligible. So, if you have long-term goals, beyond seven years, it is a good idea to have an equity-heavy portfolio.
Click NEXT to read further...

For long-term goals, it is good to have equity-heavy portfolio.
this
Users
Comment
article